Tennis AI app pricing 2026: full vendor comparison grid

Side-by-side tennis AI app pricing — AceSense, SwingVision, OnForm, TopCourt, Baseline Vision, PB Vision. With a verifiable source on every number.

Tennis-AI pricing in 2026 is a mess. Different billing units (monthly, annual, hardware-plus-subscription), different currencies, different "what's actually included on this tier." This page is the cleanest side-by-side we could build, with a source URL on every number. Updated with each pricing change.

TL;DR — the headline grid

VendorFree tierEntry paidTop tierAnnual topSource
AceSenseYes€19/mo Pro€49/mo Team€228/yr ProThis site
SwingVisionLimited$14.99/mo Plus$39.99/mo Max~$400/yr MaxSourceForge, Tennisnerd
OnFormNo$9.99/mo Athlete$59.99/mo Coachonform.com
TopCourtNo– (annual-only)$180/yr$180/yrMy Tennis Lessons
Baseline VisionNoHardware + subHardware + sub~€1,800 hwTennisLeo
PB VisionYesVendor-specificVendor-specificpb.vision

Currency note: SwingVision and OnForm bill USD. AceSense bills EUR. TopCourt bills USD. Baseline Vision is European-priced (EUR).

AceSense pricing in plain English

  • Free — €0. Full per-shot report on short videos (under a few minutes). One court at a time. No credit card.
  • Pro€19/mo or €228/yr. Unlimited match length, full feature set, async coach share.
  • Team€49/mo. Multi-coach seats, async review workflow, team dashboards.

The same shot detection, ball tracking, court heatmap, and stroke-quality scoring runs on every tier. Free is rate-limited by video length, not by feature.

SwingVision pricing in plain English

Sources: SourceForge listing, Tennisnerd review.

  • Plus$14.99/mo or $95.99/yr (≈$8/mo annualised). HD recording.
  • Pro$24.99/mo. More cloud storage, more features.
  • Max$39.99/mo (≈$400/yr). 4K capture, top-tier line calling.

The Tennisnerd review's specific quote:

"the $150/year plan gets you HD recording, but 4K and more accurate line calling require paying $400 annually" — Tennisnerd

The implication for buyers: the entry tier is not the full product. If you're price-comparing AceSense Pro (€19/mo) against SwingVision, it's worth knowing what tier of SwingVision delivers what AceSense delivers at €19/mo.

OnForm pricing in plain English

Source: onform.com/pricing.

  • Athlete$9.99–$14.99/mo. Receiving coach feedback.
  • Coach Solo$19.99/mo. Single-coach toolset.
  • Coach Pro / Team — up to $59.99/mo. Multi-coach, full analytics.

OnForm's economic model: the coach pays the coach plan, athletes pay athlete-tier on top. If you don't have a coach, the athlete tier is cheap but the value is limited because the coach loop is what the platform optimises for. See the full OnForm comparison.

TopCourt pricing in plain English

Source: My Tennis Lessons review.

  • $180/year, annual billing only. No monthly option.

Reviewer's complaint:

"you can't pay monthly, but need to commit to a year" — My Tennis Lessons

Different category — TopCourt is instructional video, not match analysis. See the TopCourt comparison.

Baseline Vision pricing in plain English

Source: TennisLeo review.

  • Hardware: ~€1,800 one-time.
  • Subscription: ongoing, vendor-specific tier.
  • Install: fence mount, mains power, network access.

Different category — hardware-and-software, not a phone app. See the Baseline Vision comparison.

PB Vision pricing in plain English

PB Vision pricing changes frequently — confirm current figures at pb.vision. It is the smaller paddle sport's analog of SwingVision; not a tennis tool. See the PB Vision comparison.

Five-year cost (individual amateur player)

If you'll keep using one of these for five years, here's the rough total:

Vendor5-year costNote
AceSense free€0If short-video tier is enough
AceSense Pro €19/mo€1,140Cancel any time
SwingVision Plus annual$480$95.99/yr × 5
SwingVision Max annual~$2,000If you want the full tier
OnForm Athlete$720$12/mo × 60, no coach loop
TopCourt$900$180/yr × 5
Baseline Vision€1,800+Plus 5 years subscription

These aren't apples-to-apples — TopCourt is instruction, Baseline Vision is hardware, OnForm needs a coach to be useful — but it's the simplest framing of "what's the lifetime cost of this decision."

What the pricing tells you about the products

A few patterns are worth naming:

  • Tier-stacking (SwingVision). The "best" feature is on the most expensive tier. You can't price-compare the entry tier against single-tier competitors because you're not buying the same product.
  • Annual lock-in (TopCourt). Annual-only billing transfers risk to the buyer. If TopCourt's content doesn't fit you, you've already paid.
  • Hardware capex (Baseline Vision). Front-loaded cost makes sense for high-volume users (clubs); painful for individuals.
  • Coach-dependency (OnForm). The athlete tier is cheap because the platform's value depends on someone else paying for the coach plan.
  • Single-tier feature parity (AceSense). Same AI on every tier. The tier divides volume and team features, not "the AI we'd give you if you paid more."

You can decide for yourself whether tier-stacking, annual lock-in, hardware capex, coach-dependency, or single-tier-flat is the model you want to buy into.

Hidden costs to watch for

Sticker price is the start, not the end. A few line items that show up in real billing:

  • Tier upgrades for features you didn't expect to need. SwingVision's 4K capture and "more accurate line calling" sit on the Max tier (Tennisnerd). If you start on Plus and want those, the upgrade path is real money.
  • Coach-plan dependency. OnForm's athlete tier value depends on a coach having a coach plan. If your coach drops OnForm, your athlete subscription becomes much less useful.
  • Hardware add-ons. Baseline Vision is hardware-first; the camera is the line item, but mounts, network, and install labour can add to the real total.
  • Annual lock-in. TopCourt's $180/yr can't be tested with a single month. If the content doesn't fit your learning style, you've paid for a year before knowing.
  • FX and currency. Most competitors bill USD. EU buyers pay FX margin on every monthly charge. AceSense bills EUR — no FX layer for EU customers.

Free-tier honest comparison

A "free tier" only counts if you can actually use the product on it.

VendorFree tierWhat's includedWhat's not
AceSenseYesFull per-shot report on short videos, all features, no cardLong full-match videos require Pro
SwingVisionLimitedSome video imports, basic featuresMost analysis features paywalled
PB VisionYes (paddle sport)Sport-specific limited tier
OnFormTrial onlyCoach plan needed for full value
TopCourtNoAnnual subscription required
Baseline VisionNoHardware purchase required

If "I want to try this without committing" is your starting filter, AceSense or PB Vision (depending on sport) are the cleanest free-tier options. SwingVision's free tier exists but is limited enough that most users describe it as a trial.

Currency, billing, and EU specifics

EU buyers face friction with USD-billed competitors:

  • FX margin. Card networks add 1–3% on USD charges to EUR cards. On a $400/yr SwingVision Max plan that's an extra $4–12/yr you don't see in the price tag.
  • VAT handling. Some vendors collect EU VAT, others don't. If your card statement shows the gross USD amount, work out whether you've actually paid VAT.
  • Data residency. Most US-billed competitors host in the US. AceSense hosts in europe-west1 (GDPR-friendly, EU data residency).
  • Receipt language. EU bookkeepers prefer EUR receipts.

For an EU player, the "real" cost of a $14.99/mo SwingVision Plus plan is closer to €15–€16/mo after FX and any uncovered VAT. AceSense Pro at €19/mo is a flat number.

What real users complain about

SwingVision pricing tiers:

"the $150/year plan gets you HD recording, but 4K and more accurate line calling require paying $400 annually" — Tennisnerd

TopCourt billing model:

"you can't pay monthly, but need to commit to a year" — My Tennis Lessons

Baseline Vision hardware connection:

"if the phone gets too far from the camera, the connection drops" — TennisLeo

These are not gotcha quotes — they're the real friction points buyers describe. We're sharing them because the pricing decision is rarely just about the price tag; it's about what you actually get for it.

FAQ

Cheapest free tier? AceSense — full per-shot report on short videos, no card.

Is annual always cheaper? Usually monthly-to-annual saves ~30–40%. TopCourt forces annual.

Cheapest way to try AI tennis analysis? AceSense free tier.

Why is SwingVision so much more expensive? Tier-stacking — the features are split across three tiers.

Why include Baseline Vision at €1,800? Because it's a real consideration for clubs and serious players.


Try AceSense free on iOS and Android. Full per-shot report on your first match. If you don't see the difference vs the alternatives, the cheapest option (€0) was also the right one.

Try AceSense free → · Pricing · vs SwingVision · vs OnForm · vs TopCourt · vs Baseline Vision

Frequently asked questions

Which tennis AI app has the cheapest free tier?
AceSense's free tier delivers a full per-shot report on short videos with no card required. SwingVision has a limited free tier. PB Vision has a free tier focused on its target sport. OnForm and TopCourt are paid-only.
Is annual billing always cheaper than monthly?
Usually, but not always usefully. SwingVision Plus annual is $95.99 vs $14.99/mo (saving $84/yr). AceSense Pro at €19/mo is the same on annual. TopCourt is annual-only at $180/yr — there's no monthly option to compare.
What's the cheapest way to try AI tennis analysis?
AceSense free tier — €0, no card. Upload one match, get a real per-shot report. If it's useful, upgrade to Pro at €19/mo. If not, you've lost nothing.
Why is SwingVision so much more expensive than AceSense?
Tier-stacking. SwingVision splits features across three tiers — the most accurate line calling and 4K capture is Max ($39.99/mo, ≈$400/yr). AceSense doesn't split features by tier; the AI is the same on free, Pro, and Team.
Why is Baseline Vision in this grid if it costs €1,800?
Because it's a real option that some clubs and serious players consider. The pricing tells the story: hardware + subscription is a different economic model from a phone app.